Xeon X5355 vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon X5355 by a whopping 2438% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon X5355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 126 | 2280 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 49.08 | 0.04 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 9 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 25.02 | 0.99 |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2024) | Clovertown (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 14 November 2006 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $1,172 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 9 7900X3D has 122600% better value for money than Xeon X5355.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon X5355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.6 GHz | 0.67 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB (per die) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm, 6 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 71+71+122 mm | 2x 143 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47 °C | 63 °C |
| Number of transistors | 13,140 million | 582 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon X5355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | AM5 | LGA771,PLGA771 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon X5355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon X5355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon X5355 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon X5355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-5200 | DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon X5355.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 32.99 | 1.30 |
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 14 November 2006 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 65 nm |
Ryzen 9 7900X3D has a 2437.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 9 7900X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5355 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 9 7900X3D is a desktop processor while Xeon X5355 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon X5355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
