Xeon Gold 6438Y+ vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 124 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 9 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 60 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm, 6 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 71+71+122 mm | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47 °C | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 13,140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | AM5 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon Gold 6438Y+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon Gold 6438Y+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon Gold 6438Y+.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 12 | 32 |
| Threads | 24 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 205 Watt |
Ryzen 9 7900X3D has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 70.8% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6438Y+, on the other hand, has 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon Gold 6438Y+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 9 7900X3D is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6438Y+ is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Xeon Gold 6438Y+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
