AMD-K6-IIIE+/400ICR vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 198 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 50.36 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 9 | AMD K6-III+ |
| Power efficiency | 10.08 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2025) | K6-III (1999−2000) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 25 September 2000 (25 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 7900X3D and AMD-K6-IIIE+/400ICR basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 4.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.6 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 99.99 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 4 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm, 6 nm | 0.18 µm |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,140 million | 21 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 7900X3D and AMD-K6-IIIE+/400ICR compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 9.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7900X3D and AMD-K6-IIIE+/400ICR. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7900X3D and AMD-K6-IIIE+/400ICR are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7900X3D and AMD-K6-IIIE+/400ICR. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-5200 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7900X3D and AMD-K6-IIIE+/400ICR.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 25 September 2000 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 1 |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 9 Watt |
Ryzen 9 7900X3D has an age advantage of 22 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.
AMD-K6-IIIE+/400ICR, on the other hand, has 1233.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and AMD AMD-K6-IIIE+/400ICR. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 9 7900X3D is a desktop processor while AMD-K6-IIIE+/400ICR is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
