Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Ryzen 9 7900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 7900X
2022
12 cores / 24 threads, 170 Watt
29.11
+132%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 6 Watt
12.55

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by a whopping 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking191676
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency18.36no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameRaphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date27 September 2022 (3 years ago)5 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2412
Base clock speed4.7 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.6 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size2x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)47 °Cno data
Number of transistorsCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM5no data
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt6 MB + 16 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions5 nm (CCD), 6 nm (I/O) nm, 0.650 - 1.475Vno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 9 7900X 29.11
+132%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 12.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 9 7900X 51329
+132%
Samples: 7587
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 22132
Samples: 23

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 7900X 2947
+32.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 2228

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 7900X 17763
+96.5%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 9041

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 9 7900X 8623
+25.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 6888

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 9 7900X 68580
+74.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 39399

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 9 7900X 21284
+64.4%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 12948

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 9 7900X 55
+153%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 22

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 7900X 4821
+159%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 1863

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 7900X 323
+29.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 249

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 9 7900X 14.8
+42.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 10.4

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 7900X 3.83
+29%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 2.97

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 9 7900X 241
+120%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 110

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 9 7900X 376
+42.4%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 264

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 9 7900X 17225
+156%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 6717

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 7900X 20668
+133%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 8863

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 7900X 8269
+40.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 5892

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 7900X 127195
+149%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 51096

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 7900X 106
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 270
+155%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 7900X 2294
+31.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 1748

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 7900X 383
+46.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 262

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 9 7900X 166
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 444
+167%

Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 7900X 18300
+79.4%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 10200

Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 7900X 2990
+27.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 2352

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.11 12.55
Integrated graphics card 4.06 12.97
Recency 27 September 2022 5 January 2023
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 12
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 9 7900X has a 132% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, on the other hand, has 219.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 2733.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 7900X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
Ryzen 9 7900X
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1596 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 22 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.