Processor N250 vs Ryzen 9 7900
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Processor N250 by a whopping 769% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 164 | 1646 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 66.02 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 44.58 | 55.56 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Twin Lake (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 14 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $429 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 7900 and Processor N250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 7900 and Processor N250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7900 and Processor N250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 9 7900 and Processor N250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7900 and Processor N250 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7900 and Processor N250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-5200 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) ( - 2200 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics 730 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7900 and Processor N250.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 9 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 30.25 | 3.48 |
| Integrated graphics card | 4.02 | 3.80 |
| Recency | 14 January 2023 | 7 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Ryzen 9 7900 has a 769.3% higher aggregate performance score, 5.8% faster integrated GPU, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Processor N250, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 983.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor N250 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 9 7900 is a desktop processor while Processor N250 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
