Xeon Gold 6538N vs Ryzen 9 7845HX

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 9 7845HX
2023
12 cores / 24 threads
29.69
+2.3%

Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms Xeon Gold 6538N by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 7845HX and Xeon Gold 6538N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking134141
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Architecture codenameDragon Range-HX (Zen 4)Emerald Rapids
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 7845HX and Xeon Gold 6538N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads2464
Base clock speed3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)60 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size2x 71 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C85 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors13,140 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 7845HX and Xeon Gold 6538N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFL1FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7845HX and Xeon Gold 6538N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 7845HX and Xeon Gold 6538N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7845HX and Xeon Gold 6538N are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7845HX and Xeon Gold 6538N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 610MN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7845HX and Xeon Gold 6538N.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes2880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 7845HX 29.69
+2.3%
Xeon Gold 6538N 29.03

Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms Xeon Gold 6538N by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 7845HX 45916
+2.3%
Xeon Gold 6538N 44895

Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms Xeon Gold 6538N by 2% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.69 29.03
Recency 4 January 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 12 32
Threads 24 64
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 205 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 9 7845HX and Xeon Gold 6538N.

Be aware that Ryzen 9 7845HX is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6538N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7845HX and Xeon Gold 6538N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
Ryzen 9 7845HX
Intel Xeon Gold 6538N
Xeon Gold 6538N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 197 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7845HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6538N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 7845HX or Xeon Gold 6538N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.