Xeon 6780E vs Ryzen 9 7840HX
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 7840HX and Xeon 6780E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) | no data |
| Architecture codename | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| Release date | 17 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | 3 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $11,350 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 7840HX and Xeon 6780E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 144 |
| Threads | 24 | 144 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 108 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9900 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 7840HX and Xeon 6780E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | FL1 | 4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 330 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7840HX and Xeon 6780E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 9 7840HX and Xeon 6780E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7840HX and Xeon 6780E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7840HX and Xeon 6780E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 610M | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7840HX and Xeon 6780E.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 88 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 January 2024 | 3 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 144 |
| Threads | 24 | 144 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 330 Watt |
Ryzen 9 7840HX has 500% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6780E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 1100% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 9 7840HX and Xeon 6780E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 9 7840HX is a notebook processor while Xeon 6780E is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7840HX and Xeon 6780E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
