A6-9220e SoC vs Ryzen 9 7840HX
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 7840HX and A6-9220e SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) | no data |
| Architecture codename | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 17 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | 7 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 7840HX and A6-9220e SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9900 Million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 7840HX and A6-9220e SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FL1 | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7840HX and A6-9220e SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7840HX and A6-9220e SoC are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7840HX and A6-9220e SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz) | Radeon R4 3CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7840HX and A6-9220e SoC.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 January 2024 | 7 January 2019 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 2 |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 6 Watt |
Ryzen 9 7840HX has an age advantage of 5 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
A6-9220e SoC, on the other hand, has 816.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 9 7840HX and A6-9220e SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7840HX and A6-9220e SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
