Ryzen 7 5825U vs Ryzen 9 5980HS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
13.43
+16.2%
Ryzen 7 5825U
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
11.56

Ryzen 9 5980HS outperforms Ryzen 7 5825U by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 5825U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking552671
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency36.3172.93
Architecture codenameCezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)6 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 5825U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.5 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm
Die size156 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistors9,800 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 5825U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 5825U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 5825U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 5825U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 5825U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5980HS 13.43
+16.2%
Ryzen 7 5825U 11.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 5980HS 21334
+16.2%
Ryzen 7 5825U 18355

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 9 5980HS 3.47
+165%
Ryzen 7 5825U 9.2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 5980HS 2083
+17.2%
Ryzen 7 5825U 1778

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 5980HS 243
+5%
Ryzen 7 5825U 232

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 9 5980HS 112
+11.2%
Ryzen 7 5825U 100

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 9 5980HS 270
+8%
Ryzen 7 5825U 250

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 5980HS 8620
+27.1%
Ryzen 7 5825U 6782

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 5980HS 246
Ryzen 7 5825U 303
+23.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 5980HS 1537
+4.7%
Ryzen 7 5825U 1468

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 5980HS 5623
+3.4%
Ryzen 7 5825U 5437

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 5980HS 57319
+20.4%
Ryzen 7 5825U 47589

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 5980HS 279
+4.7%
Ryzen 7 5825U 267

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.43 11.56
Recency 12 January 2021 6 January 2022
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 9 5980HS has a 16.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen 7 5825U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 5980HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 5825U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5980HS and Ryzen 7 5825U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
Ryzen 9 5980HS
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U
Ryzen 7 5825U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 28 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5980HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 690 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5825U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5980HS or Ryzen 7 5825U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.