EPYC 7313 vs Ryzen 9 5950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5950X
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
29.64
+16.7%

Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms EPYC 7313 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking155196
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.2817.63
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameVermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date8 October 2020 (3 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 5950X has 60% better value for money than EPYC 7313.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier3430
L1 cache1 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm+
Die sizeCPU cores: 2x 80.7 sq. mm., I/O: 125 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 7313.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5950X 29.64
+16.7%
EPYC 7313 25.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 5950X 45629
+16.7%
EPYC 7313 39091

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 5950X 2218
+49.2%
EPYC 7313 1487

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 5950X 12136
+6.2%
EPYC 7313 11432

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.64 25.39
Recency 8 October 2020 15 March 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 155 Watt

Ryzen 9 5950X has a 16.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 47.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7313, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.

The Ryzen 9 5950X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7313 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 5950X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5950X and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2419 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 30 votes

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5950X or EPYC 7313, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.