Celeron N5095 vs Ryzen 9 5900HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5900HS
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
13.61
+430%
Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.57

Ryzen 9 5900HS outperforms Celeron N5095 by a whopping 430% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5900HS and Celeron N5095 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5491741
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Jasper Lake
Power efficiency36.6116.13
Architecture codenameCezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5900HS and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography7 nm10 nm
Die size180 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors10,700 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5900HS and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 5900HS and Celeron N5095 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and Celeron N5095 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 9 5900HS and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and Celeron N5095.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 13.61
+430%
Celeron N5095 2.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 21620
+430%
Celeron N5095 4078

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 6380
+80%
Celeron N5095 3545

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 41235
+236%
Celeron N5095 12283

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 25
+430%
Celeron N5095 5

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 2041
+461%
Celeron N5095 364

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 237
+123%
Celeron N5095 106

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 2.83
+123%
Celeron N5095 1.27

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 5900HS 7867
+288%
Celeron N5095 2028

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 5900HS 241
Celeron N5095 1547
+542%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 5900HS 1497
+130%
Celeron N5095 651

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 5900HS 5653
+82.4%
Celeron N5095 3100

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 5900HS 57286
+420%
Celeron N5095 11013

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 5900HS 276
+120%
Celeron N5095 125

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 9 5900HS 1414
+189%
Celeron N5095 490

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.61 2.57
Integrated graphics card 9.05 5.58
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 9 5900HS has a 429.6% higher aggregate performance score, 62.2% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N5095, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 5900HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 9 5900HS is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900HS and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
Ryzen 9 5900HS
Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 177 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1449 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5900HS or Celeron N5095, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.