Apple M2 vs Ryzen 9 5900H
Aggregate performance score
M2 outperforms Ryzen 9 5900H by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1141 | 1052 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) | Apple Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 7.24 | 18.00 |
| Designer | AMD | Apple |
| Architecture codename | Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) | no data |
| Release date | 7 January 2021 (5 years ago) | 10 June 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Ryzen 9 5900H and M2: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.424 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 3.48 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 20 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 20000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 5900H and M2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP6 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 20 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900H and M2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000) | Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.72 | 8.53 |
| Recency | 7 January 2021 | 10 June 2022 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 20 Watt |
Ryzen 9 5900H has 100% more threads.
Apple M2, on the other hand, has a 10% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 125% lower power consumption.
The Apple M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 9 5900H in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
