Xeon E5-1620 vs Ryzen 9 5900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5900
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
21.63
+486%
Xeon E5-1620
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
3.69

Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 by a whopping 486% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E5-1620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2461495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.76
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9no data
Power efficiency31.472.68
Architecture codenameVermeer (2020−2024)Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$313

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E5-1620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB10240 KB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm32 nm
Die size81 mm2294 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data64 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,150 million1,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E5-1620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E5-1620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E5-1620 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E5-1620 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E5-1620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB375 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E5-1620.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900 21.63
+486%
Xeon E5-1620 3.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 5900 34361
+486%
Xeon E5-1620 5859

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 5900 2142
+250%
Xeon E5-1620 612

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 5900 11070
+390%
Xeon E5-1620 2257

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.63 3.69
Recency 12 January 2021 6 March 2012
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 130 Watt

Ryzen 9 5900 has a 486.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 5900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1620 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 5900 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-1620 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E5-1620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5900
Ryzen 9 5900
Intel Xeon E5-1620
Xeon E5-1620

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 108 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 171 vote

Rate Xeon E5-1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5900 or Xeon E5-1620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.