EPYC 7301 vs Ryzen 9 5900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5900
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
22.26
+130%

Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms EPYC 7301 by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7301 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking212740
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation60.701.58
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameVermeer (2020−2022)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)20 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$825
Current price$303 $1500 (1.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 5900 has 3742% better value for money than EPYC 7301.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7301 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2432
Base clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache768 KB1.5 MB
L2 cache6 MB8 MB
L3 cache64 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm14 nm
Die size81 mm2213 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,150 million19200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7301 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt155 W, 170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7301. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7301 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7301. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB2 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7301.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900 22.26
+130%
EPYC 7301 9.69

Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms EPYC 7301 by 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 5900 34429
+130%
EPYC 7301 14991

Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms EPYC 7301 by 130% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.26 9.69
Recency 12 January 2021 20 June 2017
Physical cores 12 16
Threads 24 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 155 Watt

The Ryzen 9 5900 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7301 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 5900 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7301 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900 and EPYC 7301, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5900
Ryzen 9 5900
AMD EPYC 7301
EPYC 7301

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 94 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5900 or EPYC 7301, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.