Celeron M 722 vs Ryzen 9 5900
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 294 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 9 | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 31.33 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Vermeer (2020−2024) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 12 January 2021 (4 years ago) | 1 October 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 5900 and Celeron M 722 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| Multiplier | 30 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,150 million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 5900 and Celeron M 722 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | VGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 5.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Celeron M 722. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Celeron M 722 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Celeron M 722. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Celeron M 722.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 January 2021 | 1 October 2008 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 1 |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 5 Watt |
Ryzen 9 5900 has an age advantage of 12 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 722, on the other hand, has 1200% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and Intel Celeron M 722. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 9 5900 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 722 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
