Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Ryzen 9 4900HS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
12.30
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
14.69
+19.4%

Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 4900HS and Ryzen 5 7640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking581454
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Architecture codenameRenoir (Zen 2) (2020−2021)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Release date7 March 2020 (4 years ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$1339 no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 4900HS and Ryzen 5 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size156 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors9800 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 4900HS and Ryzen 5 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 4900HS and Ryzen 5 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 4900HS and Ryzen 5 7640HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 4900HS and Ryzen 5 7640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-4266DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)AMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 4900HS and Ryzen 5 7640HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 12.30
Ryzen 5 7640HS 14.69
+19.4%

Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 4900HS 19027
Ryzen 5 7640HS 22727
+19.4%

Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 19% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 4900HS 1454
Ryzen 5 7640HS 2299
+58.1%

Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 58% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 4900HS 6378
Ryzen 5 7640HS 9048
+41.9%

Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 42% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 4900HS 1863
Ryzen 5 7640HS 2079
+11.6%

Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 12% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 4900HS 193
Ryzen 5 7640HS 271
+40.4%

Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 40% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.30 14.69
Integrated graphics card 9.08 15.28
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 4900HS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 4900HS and Ryzen 5 7640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
Ryzen 9 4900HS
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 141 vote

Rate Ryzen 9 4900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 299 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 4900HS or Ryzen 5 7640HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.