Ultra 5 125U vs Ryzen 9 4900HS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
11.93
+8.5%
Core Ultra 5 125U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 15 Watt
11.00

Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Core Ultra 5 125U by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 4900HS and Core Ultra 5 125U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking653709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiency32.0969.04
Architecture codenameRenoir (Zen 2) (2020)Meteor Lake-P (2023)
Release date7 March 2020 (4 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$363

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 4900HS and Core Ultra 5 125U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1614
Base clock speed3 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size156 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C110 °C
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 4900HS and Core Ultra 5 125U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 4900HS and Core Ultra 5 125U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 4900HS and Core Ultra 5 125U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 4900HS and Core Ultra 5 125U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 4900HS and Core Ultra 5 125U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-4266DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GB96 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)Intel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.85 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 9 4900HS and Core Ultra 5 125U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 9 4900HS and Core Ultra 5 125U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 9 4900HS and Core Ultra 5 125U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 4900HS and Core Ultra 5 125U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data12
PCI supportno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 11.93
+8.5%
Ultra 5 125U 11.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 18946
+8.4%
Ultra 5 125U 17470

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 1863
+12.4%
Ultra 5 125U 1657

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 4900HS 193
Ultra 5 125U 225
+16.6%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 4900HS 7675
Ultra 5 125U 8311
+8.3%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 4900HS 297
Ultra 5 125U 350
+17.8%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 4900HS 1218
Ultra 5 125U 1569
+28.8%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 4900HS 4634
+0.8%
Ultra 5 125U 4598

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 4900HS 48577
+24.3%
Ultra 5 125U 39087

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.93 11.00
Recency 7 March 2020 14 December 2023
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 14
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 9 4900HS has a 8.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 14.3% more threads.

Ultra 5 125U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 50% more physical cores, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 9 4900HS and Core Ultra 5 125U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 4900HS and Core Ultra 5 125U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U
Core Ultra 5 125U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 146 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 4900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 103 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 125U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 4900HS or Core Ultra 5 125U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.