Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX vs Ryzen 9 3950X
Aggregated performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Ryzen 9 3950X by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 3950X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 172 | 162 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 15.22 | 16.74 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 9 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 14 November 2019 (4 years ago) | 14 July 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | no data |
| Current price | $1272 (1.6x MSRP) | $1347 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has 10% better value for money than Ryzen 9 3950X.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 3950X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 2 x 72 mm + 125 mm (IO-Die) mm2 | 74 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | 3,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 3950X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 2 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Ryzen 9 3950X by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Ryzen 9 3950X by 4% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX by 3% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Ryzen 9 3950X by 14% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 25.09 | 26.10 |
| Recency | 14 November 2019 | 14 July 2020 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 280 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 9 3950X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
Be aware that Ryzen 9 3950X is a desktop processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3950X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
