Iris Graphics 48 vs Ryzen 9 3950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking308not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.26no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9Intel Iris Graphics
Power efficiency8.84no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Gen9
Release date14 November 2019 (6 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$799no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3950X and Iris Graphics 48 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)no data
Threads32no data
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz0.3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache64 MBno data
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size2 x 72 mm + 125 mm (IO-Die) mm2no data
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3950X and Iris Graphics 48 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)105 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and Iris Graphics 48. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and Iris Graphics 48 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and Iris Graphics 48. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size128 GB65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm

Ryzen 9 3950X has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 9 3950X and Intel Iris Graphics 48. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 9 3950X is a desktop processor while Iris Graphics 48 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel Iris Graphics 48
Iris Graphics 48

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 854 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 13 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 9 3950X and Iris Graphics 48, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.