EPYC 7502P vs Ryzen 9 3950X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3950X
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
24.37
EPYC 7502P
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
32.06
+31.6%

EPYC 7502P outperforms Ryzen 9 3950X by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 7502P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking210127
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.779.58
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9AMD EPYC
Power efficiency21.9816.87
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date14 November 2019 (5 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799$2,300

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 3950X has 96% better value for money than EPYC 7502P.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 7502P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.35 GHz
Multiplierno data25
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size2 x 72 mm + 125 mm (IO-Die) mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors19,200 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 7502P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 7502P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 7502P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 7502P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3950X 24.37
EPYC 7502P 32.06
+31.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3950X 38715
EPYC 7502P 50932
+31.6%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 3950X 1730
+79.6%
EPYC 7502P 963

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 3950X 10785
+37.9%
EPYC 7502P 7822

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.37 32.06
Recency 14 November 2019 7 August 2019
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 32 64
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 180 Watt

Ryzen 9 3950X has an age advantage of 3 months, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7502P, on the other hand, has a 31.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The EPYC 7502P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 3950X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3950X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7502P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 7502P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Ryzen 9 3950X
AMD EPYC 7502P
EPYC 7502P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 728 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 38 votes

Rate EPYC 7502P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3950X or EPYC 7502P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.