Xeon w5-2445 vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Aggregated performance score
Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon w5-2445 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon w5-2445 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 230 | 235 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 37.04 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 9 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids |
| Release date | 7 July 2019 (4 years ago) | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | no data |
| Current price | $381 (0.8x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon w5-2445 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 26.25 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon w5-2445 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 175 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon w5-2445. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon w5-2445 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon w5-2445 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon w5-2445. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 2 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon w5-2445.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon w5-2445 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon w5-2445 by 1% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon w5-2445 outperforms Ryzen 9 3900X by 6% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon w5-2445 outperforms Ryzen 9 3900X by 8% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.11 | 20.87 |
| Recency | 7 July 2019 | 1 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 10 |
| Threads | 24 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 175 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon w5-2445.
Be aware that Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop processor while Xeon w5-2445 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon w5-2445, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
