Xeon E5450 vs Ryzen 9 3900X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
21.31
+1161%

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E5450 by a whopping 1161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon E5450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2682078
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.82no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9no data
Power efficiency18.511.93
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)no data
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)1 October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon E5450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)no data
Threads24no data
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHzno data
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache6 MBno data
L3 cache64 MB12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C67 °C
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon E5450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon E5450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon E5450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon E5450 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon E5450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900X 21.31
+1161%
Xeon E5450 1.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3900X 32619
+1164%
Xeon E5450 2580

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 3900X 1710
+341%
Xeon E5450 388

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 3900X 9950
+807%
Xeon E5450 1097

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.31 1.69
Recency 7 July 2019 1 October 2007
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 80 Watt

Ryzen 9 3900X has a 1160.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5450, on the other hand, has 31.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 3900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5450 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop processor while Xeon E5450 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon E5450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel Xeon E5450
Xeon E5450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5124 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1278 votes

Rate Xeon E5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900X or Xeon E5450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.