Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Ryzen 9 3900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
21.11
+77.8%

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 4800HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking238612
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.37no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Renoir-HS (Zen 2)
Release date7 July 2019 (4 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499no data
Current price$403 (0.8x MSRP)$1141

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 4800HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistors19,200 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 4800HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 4800HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 4800HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 4800HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s68.27 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 4800HS.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900X 21.11
+77.8%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 11.87

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 3900X 32647
+77.8%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 18366

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 78% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 3900X 1695
+18.2%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 1434

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 18% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 3900X 9929
+64.2%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 6047

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 64% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 9 3900X 6019
+5.5%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 5705

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 5% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 9 3900X 45539
+25.4%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 36313

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 25% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 9 3900X 14889
+16.5%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 12785

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 16% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 9 3900X 2.69
+52.8%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 4.11

Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Ryzen 9 3900X by 53% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 9 3900X 34
+69.9%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 20

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 70% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 3900X 3049
+79.3%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 1701

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 79% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 3900X 207
+11%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 187

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 11% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 9 3900X 2.36
+7.8%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 2.19

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 8% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 3900X 10.8
+4.4%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 10.3

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 4% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 3900X 7534
+62.3%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 4642

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 62% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 3900X 147
+48.5%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 99

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 48% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 3900X 268
+23.6%
Ryzen 7 4800HS 217

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by 24% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.11 11.87
Recency 7 July 2019 6 January 2020
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 9 3900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 4800HS in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 4800HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 4800HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
Ryzen 7 4800HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5035 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 260 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4800HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900X or Ryzen 7 4800HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.