Ryzen 3 3200G vs Ryzen 9 3900X

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
20.31
+358%
Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.43

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G by a whopping 358% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 3 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2911379
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.988.90
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency15.476.49
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)12 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499$99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 3900X has 136% better value for money than Ryzen 3 3200G.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 3 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache768 KB384 KB
L2 cache6 MB2 MB
L3 cache64 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors19,200 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 3 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 3 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 3 3200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 3 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon Vega 8

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 3 3200G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 9 3900X 20.31
+358%
Ryzen 3 3200G 4.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3900X 32587
+358%
Ryzen 3 3200G 7110

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 3900X 1709
+59.1%
Ryzen 3 3200G 1074

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 3900X 9935
+224%
Ryzen 3 3200G 3062

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.31 4.43
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 9 3900X has a 358.5% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 3 3200G, on the other hand, has 61.5% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 9 3900X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5216 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3349 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 3 3200G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.