EPYC 7261 vs Ryzen 9 3900X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
20.93
+193%
EPYC 7261
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 155 Watt
7.15

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms EPYC 7261 by a whopping 193% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7261 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking269996
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.57no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9AMD EPYC
Power efficiency18.513.91
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)14 June 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7261 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplierno data25
L1 cache768 KB768 KB
L2 cache6 MB4 MB
L3 cache64 MB64 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors19,200 million19200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7261 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt155 W, 170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7261. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7261 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7261. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-2666
Maximum memory size128 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7261.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900X 20.93
+193%
EPYC 7261 7.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3900X 32619
+193%
EPYC 7261 11149

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.93 7.15
Recency 7 July 2019 14 June 2018
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 155 Watt

Ryzen 9 3900X has a 192.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 47.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 3900X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7261 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7261 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7261, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD EPYC 7261
EPYC 7261

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5131 vote

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7261 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900X or EPYC 7261, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.