Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 846 | 1112 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+) | AMD Ryzen 5 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 12.47 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Rembrandt-U Refresh (2023) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 5 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 6 September 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.75 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 34 |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 576 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FP7 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 MB + 16 MB | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 46.933 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz) | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2600.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.52 | 7.56 |
| Recency | 5 January 2023 | 6 September 2018 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U has a 39.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1525% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
