Ultra 5 125H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
11.92
Core Ultra 5 125H
2023
14 cores / 18 threads, 28 Watt
14.02
+17.6%

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U and Core Ultra 5 125H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking655527
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency75.2547.42
Architecture codenameBarcelo-U Refresh (2023)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$375

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U and Core Ultra 5 125H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1618
Base clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size180 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °C110 °C
Number of transistors10,700 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U and Core Ultra 5 125H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U and Core Ultra 5 125H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U and Core Ultra 5 125H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U and Core Ultra 5 125H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U and Core Ultra 5 125H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data96 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)Intel® Arc™ graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U and Core Ultra 5 125H.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1628
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 11.92
Ultra 5 125H 14.02
+17.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 18929
Ultra 5 125H 22264
+17.6%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 6108
Ultra 5 125H 9335
+52.8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 33735
Ultra 5 125H 51478
+52.6%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 8758
Ultra 5 125H 13866
+58.3%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 10.43
Ultra 5 125H 4.48
+133%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 18
Ultra 5 125H 27
+51.9%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 1756
Ultra 5 125H 2054
+16.9%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 229
Ultra 5 125H 247
+7.6%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 2.68
Ultra 5 125H 2.94
+9.7%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 4.2
Ultra 5 125H 9
+113%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 5274
Ultra 5 125H 6209
+17.7%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 95
Ultra 5 125H 132
+39.3%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 221
Ultra 5 125H 305
+38.1%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 6560
Ultra 5 125H 10542
+60.7%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 302
+13.1%
Ultra 5 125H 267

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 1438
Ultra 5 125H 1676
+16.6%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 5269
+4.5%
Ultra 5 125H 5043

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 254
Ultra 5 125H 254

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 1207
Ultra 5 125H 1548
+28.3%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 528
+10.2%
Ultra 5 125H 479

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 6336
Ultra 5 125H 11412
+80.1%

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 1895
Ultra 5 125H 2288
+20.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.92 14.02
Recency 4 January 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 8 14
Threads 16 18
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U has 86.7% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 125H, on the other hand, has a 17.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 75% more physical cores and 12.5% more threads.

The Core Ultra 5 125H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U and Core Ultra 5 125H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Core Ultra 5 125H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 27 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 376 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 125H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U or Core Ultra 5 125H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.