i3-9100F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 4 Watt
11.37
+200%
Core i3-9100F
2019, $122
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
3.79

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z outperforms Core i3-9100F by a whopping 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7801624
Place by popularitynot in top-10036
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.06
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesRembrandt (Zen 3+)Intel Core i3
Power efficiencyno data6.27
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameRembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date20 April 2022 (3 years ago)23 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Core i3-9100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.75 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data126 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Core i3-9100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP7FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)4 MB + 16 MB65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Core i3-9100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Core i3-9100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Core i3-9100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Core i3-9100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Core i3-9100F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 11.37
+200%
i3-9100F 3.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 20084
+200%
Samples: 49
i3-9100F 6702
Samples: 2571

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1480
+5.3%
i3-9100F 1406

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 6488
+71.8%
i3-9100F 3776

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 6238
i3-9100F 6509
+4.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 36959
+104%
i3-9100F 18118

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 7.9
+49.5%
i3-9100F 11.81

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 23
+330%
i3-9100F 5

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1992
+214%
i3-9100F 634

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 233
+36.3%
i3-9100F 171

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 7.7
+157%
i3-9100F 3

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 2.87
+47.2%
i3-9100F 1.95

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 8734
+114%
i3-9100F 4074

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 5289
+13%
i3-9100F 4682

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 52568
+207%
i3-9100F 17150

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 274
i3-9100F 687
+151%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1452
+26%
i3-9100F 1152

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 270
+32.4%
i3-9100F 204

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.37 3.79
Recency 20 April 2022 23 April 2019
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 6 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z has a 200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1525% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i3-9100F in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is a notebook processor while Core i3-9100F is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i3-9100F
Core i3-9100F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 7548 votes

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Core i3-9100F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.