Xeon Gold 6230N vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
9.45
+299%
Xeon Gold 6230N
2019, $2,046
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
2.37

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U outperforms Xeon Gold 6230N by a whopping 299% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9381984
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.23
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency67.552.03
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameCezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date19 April 2022 (3 years ago)2 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,046

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Xeon Gold 6230N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1640
Base clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache64K (per core)1.25 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)20 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)27.5 MB
Chip lithography7 nm14 nm
Die size180 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C78 °C
Number of transistors10,700 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Xeon Gold 6230N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFP6FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Xeon Gold 6230N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Xeon Gold 6230N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Xeon Gold 6230N are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Xeon Gold 6230N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Xeon Gold 6230N.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes848

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 9.45
+299%
Xeon Gold 6230N 2.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 16666
+299%
Samples: 119
Xeon Gold 6230N 4175

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.45 2.37
Recency 19 April 2022 2 April 2019
Physical cores 8 20
Threads 16 40
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U has a 298.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6230N, on the other hand, has 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Gold 6230N in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6230N is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N
Xeon Gold 6230N

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 69 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 6230N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Xeon Gold 6230N, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.