Xeon D-1541 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 outperforms Xeon D-1541 by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 496 | 1233 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.85 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon D |
| Power efficiency | 9.64 | 5.35 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | 4 April 2022 (3 years ago) | 1 November 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $581 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and Xeon D-1541 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Multiplier | no data | 21 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 1.5 MB (per core) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 74 mm2 | 246.24 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | 80 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,150 million | 3,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and Xeon D-1541 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1667 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and Xeon D-1541. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| GPIO | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and Xeon D-1541 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and Xeon D-1541 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and Xeon D-1541. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and Xeon D-1541.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 24 |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 6 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
| UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.90 | 5.73 |
| Recency | 4 April 2022 | 1 November 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has a 160% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon D-1541, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon D-1541 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is a desktop processor while Xeon D-1541 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
