A6-7310 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.77
+872%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 outperforms A6-7310 by a whopping 872% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5312314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency9.652.58
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameVermeer (2020−2025)Carrizo-L (2015)
Release date4 April 2022 (3 years ago)7 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and A6-7310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache32 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm28 nm
Die size74 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,150 million930 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and A6-7310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4FP4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt12-25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and A6-7310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and A6-7310 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and A6-7310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3L-1866
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and A6-7310 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and A6-7310 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and A6-7310.

PCIe version4.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 14.77
+872%
A6-7310 1.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 26054
+869%
Samples: 15
A6-7310 2689
Samples: 571

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 2137
+841%
A6-7310 227

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 9464
+1488%
A6-7310 596

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.77 1.52
Recency 4 April 2022 7 May 2015
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 12 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has a 871.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

A6-7310, on the other hand, has 441.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-7310 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is a desktop processor while A6-7310 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
AMD A6-7310
A6-7310

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 558 votes

Rate A6-7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and A6-7310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.