Ryzen 7 7735HS vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
2021
8 cores / 16 threads
15.81
+1%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by a minimal 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 7735HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking391394
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.03no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Architecture codenameCezanne PRO (Zen 3)Rembrandt-HS Refresh
Release date1 June 2021 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$638 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 7735HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.75 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm6 nm
Die size180 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors10,700 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 7735HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FP7
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 7735HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 7735HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 7735HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)AMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 7735HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 15.81
+1%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 15.66

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 24449
+1%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 24215

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 1% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 1942
Ryzen 7 7735HS 1962
+1%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 1% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 8222
Ryzen 7 7735HS 9264
+12.7%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 13% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 6432
Ryzen 7 7735HS 6625
+3%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 3% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 37998
Ryzen 7 7735HS 40977
+7.8%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 8% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 3.69
Ryzen 7 7735HS 3.54
+4.2%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 4% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 22
Ryzen 7 7735HS 25
+14.6%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 15% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 1956
Ryzen 7 7735HS 2174
+11.1%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 11% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 241
Ryzen 7 7735HS 248
+2.9%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 3% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 2.87
Ryzen 7 7735HS 2.94
+2.4%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 2% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 11.1
Ryzen 7 7735HS 12.8
+14.9%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 15% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 7011
+8.2%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 6478

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 8% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 250
Ryzen 7 7735HS 270
+8.3%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 8% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 113
Ryzen 7 7735HS 125
+10.5%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 11% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.81 15.66
Integrated graphics card 9.07 16.93
Recency 1 June 2021 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 7735HS.

Note that Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7735HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 7 7735HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
Ryzen 7 7735HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 142 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1082 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G or Ryzen 7 7735HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.