Core i9-12900E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
Aggregate performance score
i9-12900E outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Core i9-12900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 406 | 342 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 19.23 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Cezanne PRO (Zen 3) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | 1 June 2021 (3 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Current price | $638 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Core i9-12900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 30 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | 215 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 10,700 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Core i9-12900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Core i9-12900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Core i9-12900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Core i9-12900E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Core i9-12900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Core i9-12900E.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i9-12900E outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i9-12900E outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 9% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Core i9-12900E by 11% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i9-12900E outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by 26% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.79 | 17.24 |
| Integrated graphics card | 9.08 | 6.14 |
| Recency | 1 June 2021 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 16 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Core i9-12900E.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Core i9-12900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
