Core i3-N300 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads
4.83

Core i3-N300 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-N300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11621145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2020)Alder Lake-N
Release date8 April 2019 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$619 no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-N300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.3 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per module)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4500 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-N300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-N300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoringno data+
GPIOno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-N300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-N300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-N300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-N300.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes129
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 4.83
i3-N300 4.92
+1.9%

Core i3-N300 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 7478
i3-N300 7604
+1.7%

Core i3-N300 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U by 2% in Passmark.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 658
+58.2%
i3-N300 416

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms Core i3-N300 by 58% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 149
+75.3%
i3-N300 85

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms Core i3-N300 by 75% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.83 4.92
Integrated graphics card 4.23
Recency 8 April 2019 3 January 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 7 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-N300.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-N300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Intel Core i3-N300
Core i3-N300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 124 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 34 votes

Rate Core i3-N300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U or Core i3-N300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.