Xeon Platinum 8358 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.00
Xeon Platinum 8358
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 250 Watt
35.63
+138%

Xeon Platinum 8358 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 by a whopping 138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Xeon Platinum 8358 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking488108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency21.0012.97
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Xeon Platinum 8358 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm10 nm
Die size74 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °C81 °C
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Xeon Platinum 8358 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Xeon Platinum 8358. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Xeon Platinum 8358 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Xeon Platinum 8358 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Xeon Platinum 8358. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Xeon Platinum 8358.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 15.00
Xeon Platinum 8358 35.63
+138%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 22899
Xeon Platinum 8358 54416
+138%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.00 35.63
Recency 30 September 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 8 32
Threads 16 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 250 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 284.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8358, on the other hand, has a 137.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8358 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Xeon Platinum 8358, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
Intel Xeon Platinum 8358
Xeon Platinum 8358

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 394 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8358 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 or Xeon Platinum 8358, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.