EPYC 7313 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.40
EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
24.61
+70.9%

EPYC 7313 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking502206
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.22
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency20.8614.95
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm+
Die size74 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,800 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and EPYC 7313.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes24128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 14.40
EPYC 7313 24.61
+70.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 22877
EPYC 7313 39091
+70.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 1646
+10.7%
EPYC 7313 1487

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 7939
EPYC 7313 11432
+44%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.40 24.61
Recency 30 September 2019 15 March 2021
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 155 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has 138.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7313, on the other hand, has a 70.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 408 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 or EPYC 7313, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.