A10-6790K vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
12.92
+634%

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 outperforms A10-6790K by a whopping 634% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6502216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency21.311.89
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date30 September 2019 (6 years ago)28 October 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and A10-6790K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache32 MB0 KB
Chip lithography7 nm32 nm
Die size74 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °C74 °C
Number of transistors3,800 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and A10-6790K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and A10-6790K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX+AVX
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and A10-6790K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and A10-6790K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon HD 8670D
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and A10-6790K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and A10-6790K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and A10-6790K.

PCIe version4.02.0
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 12.92
+634%
A10-6790K 1.76

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 22789
+632%
Samples: 212
A10-6790K 3112
Samples: 138

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 1650
+362%
A10-6790K 357

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 7973
+838%
A10-6790K 850

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.92 1.76
Recency 30 September 2019 28 October 2013
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has a 634.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 53.8% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A10-6790K in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
AMD A10-6790K
A10-6790K

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 469 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 55 votes

Rate A10-6790K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and A10-6790K, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.