EPYC 72F3 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.57
EPYC 72F3
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
17.48
+282%

EPYC 72F3 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U by a whopping 282% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and EPYC 72F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1313370
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.29
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency28.309.02
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date8 January 2018 (6 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,468

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and EPYC 72F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier2237
L1 cache384 KB512 KB
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size209.78 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4950 Million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and EPYC 72F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFP5SP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and EPYC 72F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and EPYC 72F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and EPYC 72F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 10N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and EPYC 72F3.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U 4.57
EPYC 72F3 17.48
+282%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U 7121
EPYC 72F3 27252
+283%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.57 17.48
Recency 8 January 2018 12 January 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 180 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U has 1100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 72F3, on the other hand, has a 282.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 72F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is a notebook processor while EPYC 72F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U and EPYC 72F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
AMD EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 43 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 72F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U or EPYC 72F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.