Apple M1 Pro vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Aggregate performance score
M1 Pro outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1023 | 939 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 5.67 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Apple |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | no data |
| Release date | 19 September 2018 (7 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and M1 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.064 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 32 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 2.9 MB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 33700 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and M1 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | Socket AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | W |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and M1 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and M1 Pro are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and M1 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 and M1 Pro.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.72 | 9.83 |
| Recency | 19 September 2018 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 10 |
| Threads | 16 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 5 nm |
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has 60% more threads.
Apple M1 Pro, on the other hand, has a 12.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 25% more physical cores, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M1 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Pro is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
