i5-4220Y vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 outperforms Core i5-4220Y by a whopping 825% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Core i5-4220Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 822 | 2454 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | Intel Core i5 |
| Power efficiency | 13.47 | 8.24 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| Release date | 29 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 14 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $281 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Core i5-4220Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 30 | no data |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 3 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4800 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Core i5-4220Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1168 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 11.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Core i5-4220Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Smart Response | no data | + |
| GPIO | no data | + |
| Smart Connect | no data | + |
| FDI | no data | - |
| AMT | no data | 9.5 |
| Matrix Storage | no data | - |
| HD Audio | no data | + |
| RST | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Core i5-4220Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Core i5-4220Y are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Core i5-4220Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel HD Graphics 4200 |
| Max video memory | - | 2 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video HD | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | - | 850 MHz |
| InTru 3D | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Core i5-4220Y integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | - | 3 |
| eDP | - | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Core i5-4220Y integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | - | 2560x1600@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | - | 2560x1600@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Core i5-4220Y integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | - | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | - | 4.3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Core i5-4220Y.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 12 |
| PCI support | no data | - |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 4 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated IDE | no data | - |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
| UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.43 | 1.02 |
| Recency | 29 June 2017 | 14 April 2014 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 11 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has a 824.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
i5-4220Y, on the other hand, has 490.9% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-4220Y in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-4220Y is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Core i5-4220Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
