FX-7600P vs Ryzen 7 H 260

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 H 260
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
16.66
+1041%

Ryzen 7 H 260 outperforms FX-7600P by a whopping 1041% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4732413
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency15.621.76
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release dateno data4 June 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 H 260 and FX-7600P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rateno dataBGA (FP3)
L2 cacheno data4096 KB
Chip lithographyno data28 nm
Die sizeno data245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,410 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 H 260 and FX-7600P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP3
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 H 260 and FX-7600P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 H 260 and FX-7600P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 H 260 and FX-7600P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 H 260 and FX-7600P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 7 H 260 and FX-7600P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 H 260 and FX-7600P.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 H 260 16.66
+1041%
FX-7600P 1.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 7 H 260 29082
+1037%
Samples: 12
FX-7600P 2557
Samples: 140

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.66 1.46
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 7 H 260 has a 1041% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

FX-7600P, on the other hand, has 29% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-7600P in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 6 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 H 260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 12 votes

Rate FX-7600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 H 260 and FX-7600P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.