Apple M1 Pro 8-Core vs Ryzen 7 H 260
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 H 260 outperforms M1 Pro 8-Core by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 449 | 918 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M-Series |
| Designer | AMD | Apple |
| Architecture codename | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | no data |
| Release date | no data | 18 October 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 H 260 and M1 Pro 8-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 2.3 MB |
| L2 cache | no data | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 33700 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 H 260 and M1 Pro 8-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 MB + 16 MB | 28 MB + 16 MB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU ( - 1296 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.63 | 9.75 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen 7 H 260 has a 70.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 250% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 Pro 8-Core in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
