A8-6500T vs Ryzen 7 H 260
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 H 260 outperforms A8-6500T by a whopping 1381% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 463 | 2620 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 15.71 | 1.06 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Richland (2013−2014) |
| Release date | no data | 16 September 2013 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 H 260 and A8-6500T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 4096 KB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 71 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,303 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 H 260 and A8-6500T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 H 260 and A8-6500T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 H 260 and A8-6500T are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 H 260 and A8-6500T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-1866 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon™ HD 8550D |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | no data | 256 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 H 260 and A8-6500T integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen 7 H 260 and A8-6500T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 11 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 H 260 and A8-6500T.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.74 | 1.13 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
Ryzen 7 H 260 has a 1381.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
The AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A8-6500T in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 H 260 is a notebook processor while A8-6500T is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
