Xeon 674X vs Ryzen 7 9700F
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 674X outperforms Ryzen 7 9700F by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 332 | 63 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 69.16 | 23.20 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 13.80 | 7.47 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Granite Ridge (2024−2026) | Granite Rapids (2024−2026) |
| Release date | 16 September 2025 (less than a year ago) | 2 February 2026 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | $2,199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 7 9700F has 198% better value for money than Xeon 674X.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 9700F and Xeon 674X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 28 |
| Threads | 16 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.5 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 0 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 144 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Die size | 70.6 mm2 | 2x 598 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 77 °C |
| Number of transistors | 8,315 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 9700F and Xeon 674X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 270 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 9700F and Xeon 674X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 9700F and Xeon 674X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 9700F and Xeon 674X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 9700F and Xeon 674X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5(6400MT/s)MRDIMM(8000MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 9700F and Xeon 674X.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.26 | 47.79 |
| Recency | 16 September 2025 | 2 February 2026 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 28 |
| Threads | 16 | 56 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 270 Watt |
Ryzen 7 9700F has 315.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon 674X, on the other hand, has a 124.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.
The Intel Xeon 674X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 7 9700F is a desktop processor while Xeon 674X is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
