Xeon 6325P vs Ryzen 7 8700F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 8700F
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
19.51
+95.9%
Xeon 6325P
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
9.96

Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms Xeon 6325P by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking342878
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation57.5676.54
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency28.9717.47
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenamePhoenix (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date1 April 2024 (1 year ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$270$281

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6325P has 33% better value for money than Ryzen 7 8700F.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 8700F and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed4.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm10 nm
Die size178 mm2163 mm2
Number of transistors25,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 8700F and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM51700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 8700F and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 8700F and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 8700F and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 8700F and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 8700F and Xeon 6325P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 8700F 19.51
+95.9%
Xeon 6325P 9.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 7 8700F 31374
+95.9%
Xeon 6325P 16013

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.51 9.96
Recency 1 April 2024 24 February 2025
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

Ryzen 7 8700F has a 95.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon 6325P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6325P in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 8700F is a desktop processor while Xeon 6325P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F
Intel Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 515 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6325P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 8700F and Xeon 6325P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.