Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Ryzen 7 8700F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 8700F
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
19.98
+26.3%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
15.82

Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 8700F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking286442
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation52.96no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency28.6152.48
Architecture codenamePhoenix (2023−2024)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$270no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 8700F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed4.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography4 nm4 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Number of transistors25,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 8700F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM5FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 8700F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 8700F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 8700F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 8700F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 8700F 19.98
+26.3%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 15.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 8700F 31152
+26.3%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 24659

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.98 15.82
Recency 1 April 2024 1 October 2024
Threads 16 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 8700F has a 26.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, 0% more threads, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 8700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 8700F is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 8700F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 163 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 8700F or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.