Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Ryzen 7 7735H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7735H
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.65
+27.4%

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 9 4900HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking412585
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameRembrandt-H RefreshRenoir (Zen 2) (2020−2021)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)7 March 2020 (4 years ago)
Current priceno data$1339

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 9 4900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.75 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm7 nm
Die size208 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 9 4900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP7FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 9 4900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 9 4900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 9 4900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR4-4266
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 680MAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 9 4900HS.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7735H 15.65
+27.4%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 12.28

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 7735H 24207
+27.4%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 19001

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 27% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 7 7735H 6438
+9.8%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 5866

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 10% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 7735H 35222
Ryzen 9 4900HS 37938
+7.7%

Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 8% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 7735H 12924
+3.8%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 12448

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 4% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 7735H 3.81
Ryzen 9 4900HS 3.28
+16.2%

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 16% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 7735H 21
+16.1%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 18

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 16% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 7735H 1825
Ryzen 9 4900HS 1863
+2.1%

Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 2% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 7735H 246
+27.5%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 193

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 27% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 7735H 2.91
+30.5%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 2.23

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 30% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 7735H 10.6
Ryzen 9 4900HS 11.2
+5.7%

Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 6% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 7735H 5997
+31.9%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 4548

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 32% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 7735H 104
Ryzen 9 4900HS 106
+2.3%

Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7735H by 2% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 7735H 252
+12.8%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 223

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by 13% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.65 12.28
Integrated graphics card 17.36 9.08
Recency 4 January 2023 7 March 2020
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm

The Ryzen 7 7735H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 4900HS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 9 4900HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
Ryzen 9 4900HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 212 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 141 vote

Rate Ryzen 9 4900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7735H or Ryzen 9 4900HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.