EPYC 7203P vs Ryzen 7 7735H
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms EPYC 7203P by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 582 | 645 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 29.00 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 16.23 | 4.41 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | 1 April 2023 (2 years ago) | 5 September 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $348 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 7735H and EPYC 7203P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.75 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 208 mm2 | 2x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 8,300 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 7735H and EPYC 7203P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP7 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and EPYC 7203P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and EPYC 7203P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and EPYC 7203P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and EPYC 7203P.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.44 | 12.53 |
| Recency | 1 April 2023 | 5 September 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 120 Watt |
Ryzen 7 7735H has a 7.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 242.9% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7203P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Ryzen 7 7735H and AMD EPYC 7203P.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 7735H is a notebook processor while EPYC 7203P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
