Atom N280 vs Ryzen 7 7735H
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Atom N280 by a whopping 14778% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 623 | 3665 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 41.02 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) | DiamondVille (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 1 April 2023 (2 years ago) | 1 February 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom N280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.75 GHz | 0.07 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 666.66 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 10 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 56 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 208 mm2 | 25.9638 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 47 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.9V-1.1625V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom N280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FP7 | PBGA437 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 2.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom N280. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom N280 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom N280 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom N280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz) | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom N280.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.39 | 0.09 |
| Recency | 1 April 2023 | 1 February 2009 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 2 Watt |
Ryzen 7 7735H has a 14777.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.
Atom N280, on the other hand, has 1650% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 7 7735H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N280 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
