Xeon Gold 6434 vs Ryzen 7 7700X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7700X
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
23.09
+44.9%
Xeon Gold 6434
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 195 Watt
15.93

Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Xeon Gold 6434 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7700X and Xeon Gold 6434 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking230433
Place by popularity97not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.6014.15
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency20.427.59
Architecture codenameRaphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date29 August 2022 (2 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399$2,607

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 7700X has 208% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6434.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7700X and Xeon Gold 6434 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed4.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache512 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)22.5 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size71+122 mmno data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)61 °C64 °C
Number of transistors6,570 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7700X and Xeon Gold 6434 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM5FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt195 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7700X and Xeon Gold 6434. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475VIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 7700X and Xeon Gold 6434 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7700X and Xeon Gold 6434 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7700X and Xeon Gold 6434. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7700X and Xeon Gold 6434.

PCIe version5.05
PCI Express lanes2480

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7700X 23.09
+44.9%
Xeon Gold 6434 15.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7700X 35989
+44.9%
Xeon Gold 6434 24836

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.09 15.93
Recency 29 August 2022 10 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 195 Watt

Ryzen 7 7700X has a 44.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6434, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

The Ryzen 7 7700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6434 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 7700X is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6434 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7700X and Xeon Gold 6434, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Ryzen 7 7700X
Intel Xeon Gold 6434
Xeon Gold 6434

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1488 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6434 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7700X or Xeon Gold 6434, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.